Sweaty Messes and Muddy Brushes: What to Do When Nothing Works
Why I Blame the 90s for My Weirdly Sized Miniature Art
I’m dipping my toes into the miniature art-for-sale waters, but if you look closely at my tiny paintings, you’ll notice something strange. They aren’t the standard 2.5" x 3.5".
They might be 2.5" x 4". If I’m feeling chaotic, they might be 3" x 3".
There’s a very specific and slightly stubborn reason for that extra half-inch. It all goes back to the dark ages of the internet.
The Golden Rule of the ATC
Way back when—not quite the dawn of Mail Art, but exactly when it started growing exponentially online—I was deep in the Artist Trading Card (ATC) community. (Any old-school internet folks remember Nervousness? Anyone? Bueller?)
It was a rich, vibrant, and vital ecosystem of global creatives. We had exactly one sacred, unshakeable rule: The cards had to be 2.5" x 3.5" and they HAD to be traded. Never sold.
It was entirely about the give and take. The pure freewill and sharing of art.
Enter the ACEO (and the Elder Scoff)
Fast forward to the early Oughts. Someone decided that trading wasn’t enough and wanted to start selling their cards. Thus, the ACEO (Art Cards, Editions and Originals) was born. Same size, but with a price tag.
As ATC elders, we scoffed. How dare they?! It felt like a capitalistic glitch in a beautifully pure system.
Breaking the Rules to Keep the Spirit
Almost thirty years later, that purist instinct still rankles a little bit. To my hands and my brain, 2.5" x 3.5" will always belong to the spirit of the trade.
So, as I begin offering my own miniature portraits for sale, I’m changing the format. By stretching the boundaries to 2.5" x 4", I’m drawing a line between the past and the present. It’s my nod of respect to the old guard.
But make no mistake: whether my cards are traded or sold, every single square inch is still entirely imbued with the love, chaotic energy, and community spirit of those early Mail Art days.
Capturing Liz: Turning a Dark, Moody Photo into Electric Acrylic
The Spark: Choosing the Attitude
The Foundation: Orange Gesso and the Initial Lines
The Blueprint: The Four-Colour Underpainting
Building the Layers: Blocking in the Palette
The Final Touches: Carving Out the Shadows
New Work: Finding the Heat in High Contrast
There is a specific kind of summer afternoon where the air is so heavy, you don't just feel the temperature—you SEE it. That blinding, overwhelming sensation of peak summer is exactly what I wanted to capture in my latest piece, "Facing the Heat." This painting is currently on display at the Lunenburg Art Gallery as part of the Sand, Sea and Sky group exhibition.
The Challenge of a Smaller Canvas
If you’ve followed my work for a while, you know I usually love to move across larger surfaces. Working on a much smaller scale at just 8x10 inches was a massive shift in gravity.
When you compress an expressive portrait down to this size, every single movement matters. I wanted to keep the application loose, intuitive, and immediate, but a smaller canvas demands a different level of focus. Every brushstroke had to be made with absolute intention. There was no room to hide a lazy mark or overwork a section—it required a delicate dance between restraint and raw energy.
Radiating Warmth Through White Space
The biggest conceptual hurdle was making a painting feel intensely hot while using a color palette dominated by white.
Usually, we associate heat with heavy, dense blocks of warm tones. Here, I wanted the background to mimic that overexposed, bleached-out quality of a scorching afternoon sun. By keeping the vast majority of the space stark and light, the figure has to carry the full weight of the temperature.
To push the vibrancy even further, I experimented with the shadows. Alongside my usual primary magenta, I introduced a deep, dominant teal for the cooler values. It created a brilliant, vibrating contrast against the blazing yellow and orange underpainting peeking through. The teal shadows don't just ground the figure; they make the surrounding whites feel like they are actively shimmering with heat.
Part of a Shared Horizon
"Facing the Heat" doesn't stand entirely alone. It is part of a thematic trilogy created specifically for the gallery show, sitting alongside two other pieces that explore different facets of our coastal summers—from the relentless gaze of a local beach gull to a vintage-inspired figure wading by the shore. Seeing them lined up on the easel together really emphasized how much fun it was to push the boundaries of scale and color for this series.
See it in Person
If you are in the area, please go check out the Sand, Sea and Sky show at The Lunenburg Art Gallery! Opening is Friday, July 3 from 5pm. I'll be there, come say "Hi!" The show runs until August 1, gallery hours: Wednesday - Sunday from 11am - 4pm.
Squinting Into the Shadows: What a High-Contrast Value Exercise Taught Me About Seeing
Every now and then, it’s incredibly healthy to throw yourself entirely out of your comfort zone. If you’ve been following my work for a while, you know how much I love diving straight into expressive color, rich paintings, and bold, intuitive brushwork. But the other day, I took a lesson that completely stripped away my favorite safety nets—namely color and fine detail—and forced me to focus entirely on one thing: structural value.
The assignment sounded simple on paper, but it turned out to be an incredibly challenging, eye-opening exercise in learning how to truly see.
The Exercise: Stripping It Down to Black and White
The lesson started with a scavenger hunt for multiple reference images. Once I had them, the real challenge began. We were told to scale things way down, tracing the core elements of our references into small, constrained 4"x4" squares. Shrinking the workspace immediately stops you from getting caught up in tiny details; you physically don't have the room for them.
Next came the hard part: finding just the shadow and the light. No mid-tone transitions, no soft blending, no color cues. To do this, I dug out a mismatch of grey markers. I ended up using four distinct tones: a light grey, a medium grey, what I thought was black (but turned out to be more of a deep charcoal dark grey), and an intensely deep, true black.
Using only these markers, I had to block out the shapes of light and shadow. It forces you to look at a face or a scene not as a collection of features, but as a puzzle of interlocking geometric values. You have to squint until the details blur away and only the abstract structure remains.














